Facebook Campaign: Objective 4

With my Facebook campaign I planned to get my feet wet in promoting myself as a sports talk radio personality. I intended to post at least twice a week, but most often I only was able to post content once a week. My original goal was to attract the attention of potential employers fans. I have not heard from any potential employers as of yet, but I have gained a small following from this by sports fans.

Create a Facebook ad

Facebook campaign insights

Recognizing Default Responses

As I read through my On The Media blog posts I noticed that I have a positive default response about anything that I can personally relate to whereas my default response to things that I can't relate to is to disregard them. Disregarding them usually comes in one of two forms. One is I don't believe it's true or two I  acknowledge it's true but it's not that important.
All three of my OTM posts were about topics that care about. For example, I chose to write about media portrayal of millennials because I identify as one and I agree that there are too many negative stereotypes about millennials in the media. I chose to write about the poverty tour for a couple of reasons. First is because I have been homeless before. It wasn't for very long and luckily I still was able to live in motel at the time with a roof over my head, but I was homeless nonetheless. I did not experience the same things that the poor Ohioans they focused on in the OTM story experienced, but being homeless for a short period of time has enabled me to have more empathy for anyone in that situation. Second is I'm taking a sociology class and I much more informed about society's role in perpetuating the unfortunate situations that poor people are living in. I chose to write about ISIS' weakened state because I'm passionate about America and our allies defeating terrorist organizations including ISIS.
There were many others I could have written about, but chose not to because I could not relate to them. For example in September I could have written about the OTM story on safe places on college campuses. One reason I didn't is because I never had to think about the need for safe places. I am a white, straight, Mormon male in southern Utah. Why would I ever feel that I needed a place to go to feel safe talking about my experiences? Everywhere I look is a safe place for me. Because of that I didn't feel the need to step outside myself to find the merits of other people living here having that safe place to go to and talk about their experiences on DSU's campus.
I have made an effort to change and be more empathetic of others that may or may not be in very different situations than me because of their race, gender, sexuality, religious beliefs or lack thereof, or whatever context it may be. One of the ways I am doing that is by taking more time to consider things that I see on social media or hear and see on the news before I form an opinion about it. For example I initially had a negative attitudinal response to Colin Kaepernick kneeling during the playing of the national anthem. I thought it was totally disrespectful and as a result I decided to lose respect for his character. Then as I took the time to consider his cause and how he was going about promoting it, my respect for him and what he was doing grew. I no longer make any negative judgment about Kaepernick or the Black Lives Matter movement. I disagree with kneeling during the anthem, but I am tolerant and respectful of those that choose to do so. And I am respectful of any peaceful form of protest regarding our country's handling of social issues.
Before this semester I would have disregarded Kaepernick and black people's cause and their peaceful forms of protest because I could not relate to it. Now I admire the actions he and others have taken and I am much more tolerant and respectful of them. I hope to continue to change for the better in that regard.

WI: Syria and Immagration

For this Well Informed post I decided to do a search on Facebook instead of google to see what I would find on a social media platform about Syria and immigration. Before I started the search I guessed that I would find a lot of posts about ISIS and terrorism, however when I typed "Syria immigration" in the Facebook search box I mostly found reports about politicians' and political comentators' reaction to mass immigration from Syria. 

Seriously though I shouldn't be all that surprised about the search results. Given that we are in the middle of election season here in the US if you search for anything controversial, be it on google or social media, you will probably find that the majority of links, like this one, are about something a politician said on the topic or some kind of political commentary. Honestly, I don't think that is the best thing for Americans that are trying to be well informed. We would be much better served if when we searched these topics, more links were dedicated to investigative journalism pieces or feature stories like this. For example Americans would be much more well informed about Syria and immigration if the stories we searched for tell us more facts about the refugees and their reasons for immigrating, instead of political rhetoric about why we should or shouldn't accept Syrian refugees into our country. This is simply another example the politics of a situation taking precedence over the substance of it in social media.

OTM 3: Collapse of ISIS propaganda machine

Bob Garfield interviewed Charlie Winter a researcher at the International Center for the study of radicalization and political violence about the recent decline of ISIS propaganda. Winter claims that ISIS propaganda is declining and that the decline can be contributed to a couple of things. First social media sites are being more vigilant at identifying accounts that may be linked to terrorists and/or ISIS and shutting them down. Second the US military has successfully killed or captured much of ISIS' leadership in the past year this has caused disarray in ISIS.
My thoughts as I listened to this is if ISIS is weakening, then why is there still so much debate on how to defeat them? It seems to me like our strategy of cutting them off on social media and targeted drone attacks is working. The memory of 9/11 and the psychological context of the entire "war on terror" might be what is driving that feeling that we aren't doing enough to defeat ISIS and/or that what we are doing isn't working. It could just be Trump constantly talking about ISIS that is causing the misperception. In my opinion both the memory of 9/11 and the recent ISIS attacks as well as Trump's nonstop rhetoric evoke a psychological response within us that makes us feel like whatever we do to combat terrorist organizations is not enough. The fear of the next attack makes us disregard whatever real progress we are making in this fight against terrorism.

OTM 2: The Poverty Tour

Brooke Gladstone went on a poverty tour in Ohio and interviewed welfare advocate Jack Frech. Frech suggests that the poverty crisis in America has less to do with liberal or conservative politics and more to do with the American popluation that does not want to change their mind about poor people. For so long many people including myself have been indoctrinated in the idea that poor people are poor because they are lazy or stupid. If they only were willing to work hard or if only they were capable of making smarter decisions they wouldn't be poor. Frech says this those are the misperceptions that Americans deal in all the time when it comes to poor people.
I am taking a sociology class this semester and in that class we talk about what things in our society are contributing influences to human behavior. This OTM illuminated the social context in which Frech and Gladstone were speaking about America's poverty problem. If we're seeing the poor as products of their own poor choices or as products of their unintelligence than we're not seeing a bigger problem which is the lack of support these the poor receives in our country. The true solution to this problem will be found after we as an American society understand that it may not be the poor that need to change as much as the wealthier middle and upper class does.